Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/109 names scored today/last score 11:07 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / C vs NU · /stock/C?vs=NU (was /compare/C,NU)

NU has the strongest read; C has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: C’s read rests on 8,393 contracts but our 4h record on it is 38%; NU’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
C Citigroup · Banking×
NU Nu Holdings · Banking×
The readNeutralStrongly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite−8.1+32.9
Evidence 74 74
Quality9182
Price$128.83$15.38
Contracts today8,39324,107
Calibrationneutral · −0.51% · n=4,671hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h38% of 412 checked25% of 1,034 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

CNUtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add JPMWhy is C’s record 38%?