AIFU has the strongest read; MET has the most behind it.
Two lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MET’s read rests on 1,653 contracts but our 4h record on it is 31%; AIFU’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
AIFUTRVMETtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish | Mildly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +89.7 | +15.6 | −25.0 |
| Evidence | 37 | 61 | 65 |
| Quality | 24 | 77 | 86 |
| Price | $10.91 | $368.84 | $98.47 |
| Contracts today | 0 | 709 | 1,653 |
| Calibration | has paid +31.94% · n=11,250 | hasn’t paid −0.25% · n=9,682 | hasn’t paid +2.29% · n=7,579 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 37% of 160 checked | 29% of 298 checked | 31% of 326 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.