Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/166 names scored today/last score 15:07 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / AIG vs MET · /stock/AIG?vs=MET (was /compare/AIG,MET)

MET has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

No lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MET’s read rests on 1,653 contracts but our 4h record on it is 31%; MET’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

AIGMETtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
AIG American Internationa… · Insurance×
MET MetLife · Insurance×
The readNeutralMildly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite−5.1−25.0
Evidence 52 65
Quality8486
Price$77.05$98.47
Contracts today7321,653
Calibrationneutral · +9.94% · n=4,567hasn’t paid +2.29% · n=7,579
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h35% of 2,000 checked31% of 326 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add TRVWhy is MET’s record 31%?