Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/127 names scored today/last score 13:21 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / BAC vs C · /stock/BAC?vs=C (was /compare/BAC,C)

C has the strongest read; BAC has the most behind it.

No lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: BAC’s read rests on 273,460 contracts but our 4h record on it is 11%; C’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

BACCtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
BAC Bank of America · Banking×
C Citigroup · Banking×
The readNeutralNeutral
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite−6.3−8.1
Evidence 76 74
Quality8591
Price$53.64$128.83
Contracts today273,4608,393
Calibrationneutral · +1.15% · n=1,055neutral · −0.51% · n=4,671
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h11% of 1,553 checked38% of 412 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add JPMWhy is BAC’s record 11%?