ALMS has the strongest read; BMY has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: BMY’s read rests on 6,806 contracts but our 4h record on it is 16%; ALMS’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
BMYALMStape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +33.3 | −35.1 |
| Evidence | 71 | 48 |
| Quality | 84 | 72 |
| Price | $59.75 | $6.07 |
| Contracts today | 6,806 | 171 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.87% · n=8,412 | has paid −0.38% · n=14,059 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 16% of 410 checked | 21% of 823 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.