CCI has the strongest read; SBAC has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: SBAC’s read rests on 4,922 contracts but our 4h record on it is 26%; CCI’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
CCISBACtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +60.9 | +45.2 |
| Evidence | 62 | 71 |
| Quality | 64 | 84 |
| Price | $68.85 | $170.01 |
| Contracts today | 345 | 4,922 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 9% of 1,493 checked | 26% of 286 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.