CCI has the strongest read; FRMI has the most behind it.
All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: FRMI’s read rests on 31,524 contracts but our 4h record on it is 49%; CCI’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
CCISBACFRMItape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +60.9 | +45.2 | +39.8 |
| Evidence | 62 | 71 | 76 |
| Quality | 64 | 84 | 82 |
| Price | $68.85 | $170.01 | $3.74 |
| Contracts today | 345 | 4,922 | 31,524 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 9% of 1,493 checked | 26% of 286 checked | 49% of 1,415 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.