CF has the strongest read; ALB has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: ALB’s read rests on 3,769 contracts but our 4h record on it is 18%; CF’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
CFALBtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Mildly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +22.7 | +11.6 |
| Evidence | 56 | 61 |
| Quality | 78 | 78 |
| Price | $111.54 | $102.10 |
| Contracts today | 3,410 | 3,769 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499 | hasn’t paid −0.25% · n=9,682 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 24% of 424 checked | 18% of 422 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.