SQ has the strongest read, and the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: SQ’s read rests on 43,471 contracts but our 4h record on it is 0%; SQ’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 38 days, same axis
CGNTSQtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +28.1 | +34.5 |
| Evidence | 52 | 88 |
| Quality | 52 | 97 |
| Price | $8.74 | $0.00 |
| Contracts today | 407 | 43,471 |
| Calibration | not enough history | hasn’t paid −1.23% · n=7,893 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 13% of 308 checked | 0% of 146 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.