ES has the strongest read; NEE has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: NEE’s read rests on 10,833 contracts but our 4h record on it is 29%; ES’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
ESNEEtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +26.2 | +23.3 |
| Evidence | 62 | 74 |
| Quality | 69 | 87 |
| Price | $64.50 | $77.11 |
| Contracts today | 282 | 10,833 |
| Calibration | has paid +31.94% · n=11,250 | hasn’t paid −0.74% · n=9,948 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 35% of 350 checked | 29% of 1,945 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.