ESS has the strongest read; FRMI has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: FRMI’s read rests on 31,524 contracts but our 4h record on it is 49%; ESS’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
ESSFRMItape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +40.1 | +39.8 |
| Evidence | 59 | 76 |
| Quality | 79 | 82 |
| Price | $270.93 | $3.74 |
| Contracts today | 290 | 31,524 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 18% of 403 checked | 49% of 1,415 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.