ET has the strongest read; UEC has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: UEC’s read rests on 36,158 contracts but our 4h record on it is 38%; ET’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
ETUECtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +45.6 | +33.8 |
| Evidence | 67 | 81 |
| Quality | 81 | 90 |
| Price | $20.74 | $10.19 |
| Contracts today | 12,396 | 36,158 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 16% of 1,097 checked | 38% of 136 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.