FNGR has the strongest read; TMUS has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: TMUS’s read rests on 15,875 contracts but our 4h record on it is 6%; FNGR’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
FNGRTMUStape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +82.9 | +32.2 |
| Evidence | 53 | 69 |
| Quality | 55 | 80 |
| Price | $0.20 | $151.87 |
| Contracts today | 478 | 15,875 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.04% · n=83,764 | hasn’t paid −1.22% · n=17,968 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 13% of 866 checked | 6% of 1,314 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.