HTZ has the strongest read, and the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: HTZ’s read rests on 7,147 contracts but our 4h record on it is 30%; HTZ’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
HTZUNPtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +70.2 | +61.1 |
| Evidence | 76 | 66 |
| Quality | 77 | 83 |
| Price | $1.88 | $278.34 |
| Contracts today | 7,147 | 545 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 30% of 2,000 checked | 5% of 623 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.