NB has the strongest read; FCX has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: FCX’s read rests on 33,102 contracts but our 4h record on it is 25%; NB’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
NBFCXtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Neutral |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +83.3 | +0.1 |
| Evidence | 72 | 76 |
| Quality | 71 | 91 |
| Price | $3.40 | $72.60 |
| Contracts today | 3,710 | 33,102 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | neutral · −0.51% · n=4,671 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 19% of 560 checked | 25% of 1,122 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.