NB has the strongest read; MP has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MP’s read rests on 15,575 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; NB’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
NBMPFCXNUEtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Neutral | Neutral | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||||
| Composite | +83.3 | +9.0 | +0.1 | −31.0 |
| Evidence | 72 | 76 | 76 | 58 |
| Quality | 71 | 92 | 91 | 74 |
| Price | $3.40 | $47.00 | $72.60 | $251.41 |
| Contracts today | 3,710 | 15,575 | 33,102 | 1,604 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | neutral · −0.51% · n=4,671 | neutral · −0.51% · n=4,671 | hasn’t paid +0.10% · n=21,921 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||||
| Our record here, 4h | 19% of 560 checked | 20% of 743 checked | 25% of 1,122 checked | 26% of 299 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.