Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Mon 12 Oct 2026/US closed · opens 14:30 BST/290 names scored today/last score 23:58 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / NB vs MP, NUE · /stock/NB?vs=MP,NUE (was /compare/NB,MP,NUE)

NB has the strongest read; MP has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MP’s read rests on 15,575 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; NB’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

NBMPNUEtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
NB NioCorp Developments · Metals & Mining×
MP MP Materials · Metals & Mining×
NUE Nucor · Metals & Mining×
The readStrongly bullishNeutralStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+83.3+9.0−31.0
Evidence 72 76 58
Quality719274
Price$3.40$47.00$251.41
Contracts today3,71015,5751,604
Calibrationhasn’t paid −0.09% · n=87,750neutral · −0.59% · n=4,187hasn’t paid +0.36% · n=19,919
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h19% of 560 checked20% of 743 checked26% of 299 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add FCXWhy is MP’s record 20%?