Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/127 names scored today/last score 13:21 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / NU vs BAC · /stock/NU?vs=BAC (was /compare/NU,BAC)

NU has the strongest read; BAC has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: BAC’s read rests on 273,460 contracts but our 4h record on it is 11%; NU’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

NUBACtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
NU Nu Holdings · Banking×
BAC Bank of America · Banking×
The readStrongly bullishNeutral
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+32.9−6.3
Evidence 74 76
Quality8285
Price$15.38$53.64
Contracts today24,107273,460
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061neutral · +1.15% · n=1,055
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h25% of 1,034 checked11% of 1,553 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add JPMWhy is BAC’s record 11%?