TFC has the strongest read; BAC has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: BAC’s read rests on 273,460 contracts but our 4h record on it is 11%; TFC’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
NUBACTFCtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Neutral | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +32.9 | −6.3 | −37.6 |
| Evidence | 74 | 76 | 55 |
| Quality | 82 | 85 | 60 |
| Price | $15.38 | $53.64 | $46.18 |
| Contracts today | 24,107 | 273,460 | 833 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.37% · n=22,387 | neutral · +1.26% · n=1,013 | hasn’t paid +0.27% · n=20,898 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 25% of 1,034 checked | 11% of 1,553 checked | 34% of 295 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.