TFC has the strongest read; NU has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: NU’s read rests on 24,107 contracts but our 4h record on it is 25%; TFC’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
NUTFCtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +32.9 | −37.6 |
| Evidence | 74 | 55 |
| Quality | 82 | 60 |
| Price | $15.38 | $46.18 |
| Contracts today | 24,107 | 833 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.37% · n=22,387 | hasn’t paid +0.27% · n=20,898 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 25% of 1,034 checked | 34% of 295 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.