OOMA has the strongest read; ORCL has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: ORCL’s read rests on 154,903 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; OOMA’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
OOMAORCLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +40.4 | +23.1 |
| Evidence | 52 | 91 |
| Quality | 58 | 97 |
| Price | $20.00 | $143.57 |
| Contracts today | 145 | 154,903 |
| Calibration | has paid +0.01% · n=91,227 | has paid +1.11% · n=9,211 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 34% of 283 checked | 20% of 825 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.