Stocks / OOMA vs ORCL, PLTR, AAPL · /stock/OOMA?vs=ORCL,PLTR,AAPL (was /compare/OOMA,ORCL,PLTR,AAPL)
OOMA has the strongest read; ORCL has the most behind it.
Three lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: ORCL’s read rests on 154,903 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; OOMA’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
OOMAORCLPLTRAAPLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish | Mildly bullish | Neutral |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||||
| Composite | +40.4 | +23.1 | +22.9 | +7.5 |
| Evidence | 52 | 91 | 91 | 89 |
| Quality | 58 | 97 | 98 | 97 |
| Price | $20.00 | $143.57 | $198.78 | $333.40 |
| Contracts today | 145 | 154,903 | 798,353 | 369,483 |
| Calibration | has paid +0.01% · n=91,227 | has paid +1.11% · n=9,211 | has paid +1.11% · n=9,211 | neutral · +1.26% · n=1,013 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||||
| Our record here, 4h | 34% of 283 checked | 20% of 825 checked | 12% of 1,052 checked | 11% of 1,968 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.