Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sun 11 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/185 names scored today/last score 16:51 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / P vs AAPL · /stock/P?vs=AAPL (was /compare/P,AAPL)

P has the strongest read; AAPL has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: AAPL’s read rests on 369,483 contracts but our 4h record on it is 11%; P’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

PAAPLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
P Everpure · Technology×
AAPL Apple · Technology×
The readStrongly bullishNeutral
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+29.0+7.5
Evidence 67 89
Quality8097
Price$152.52$333.40
Contracts today10,076369,483
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.37% · n=22,387neutral · +1.26% · n=1,013
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h39% of 243 checked11% of 1,968 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add PLTRWhy is AAPL’s record 11%?