Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/222 names scored today/last score 17:41 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / PINS vs META · /stock/PINS?vs=META (was /compare/PINS,META)

PINS has the strongest read; META has the most behind it.

Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: META’s read rests on 263,820 contracts but our 4h record on it is 22%; PINS’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

PINSMETAtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
PINS Pinterest · Media×
META Meta Platforms · Media×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+40.7+34.9
Evidence 73 83
Quality8984
Price$21.18$740.11
Contracts today5,286263,820
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h27% of 351 checked22% of 2,000 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add AMCWhy is META’s record 22%?