ENGN has the strongest read; PURR has the most behind it.
Two lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: PURR’s read rests on 8,227 contracts but our 4h record on it is 14%; ENGN’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
PURRRGNXENGNtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Mildly bullish | Mildly bullish | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +23.1 | +22.7 | −83.3 |
| Evidence | 78 | 57 | 68 |
| Quality | 91 | 58 | 60 |
| Price | $11.30 | $8.03 | $1.75 |
| Contracts today | 8,227 | 1,451 | 3,311 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.74% · n=9,948 | hasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499 | hasn’t paid +0.10% · n=21,921 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 14% of 2,000 checked | 24% of 637 checked | 4% of 1,389 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.