QNT has the strongest read; AAPL has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: AAPL’s read rests on 369,483 contracts but our 4h record on it is 11%; QNT’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
QNTAAPLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Mildly bullish | Neutral |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +11.7 | +7.5 |
| Evidence | 69 | 89 |
| Quality | 86 | 97 |
| Price | $41.39 | $333.40 |
| Contracts today | 1,251 | 369,483 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499 | neutral · +1.15% · n=1,055 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 21% of 558 checked | 11% of 1,968 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.