S has the strongest read; ORCL has the most behind it.
All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: ORCL’s read rests on 154,903 contracts but our 4h record on it is 20%; S’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
SORCLPLTRtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +43.0 | +23.1 | +22.9 |
| Evidence | 65 | 91 | 91 |
| Quality | 77 | 97 | 98 |
| Price | $25.95 | $143.57 | $198.78 |
| Contracts today | 1,258 | 154,903 | 798,353 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.09% · n=87,750 | has paid +1.18% · n=9,055 | has paid +1.18% · n=9,055 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 34% of 502 checked | 20% of 825 checked | 12% of 1,052 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.