SLQT has the strongest read; CB has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: CB’s read rests on 1,089 contracts but our 4h record on it is 40%; SLQT’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
SLQTCBtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Neutral |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +31.5 | −6.9 |
| Evidence | 48 | 59 |
| Quality | 52 | 82 |
| Price | $0.36 | $343.78 |
| Contracts today | 93 | 1,089 |
| Calibration | has paid +31.94% · n=11,250 | neutral · +9.94% · n=4,567 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 27% of 295 checked | 40% of 403 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.