SLQT has the strongest read; MET has the most behind it.
Two lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MET’s read rests on 1,653 contracts but our 4h record on it is 31%; SLQT’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
SLQTTRVCBMETtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish | Neutral | Mildly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||||
| Composite | +31.5 | +15.6 | −6.9 | −25.0 |
| Evidence | 48 | 61 | 59 | 65 |
| Quality | 52 | 77 | 82 | 86 |
| Price | $0.36 | $368.84 | $343.78 | $98.47 |
| Contracts today | 93 | 709 | 1,089 | 1,653 |
| Calibration | has paid +31.94% · n=11,250 | hasn’t paid −0.25% · n=9,682 | neutral · +9.94% · n=4,567 | hasn’t paid +2.29% · n=7,579 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||||
| Our record here, 4h | 27% of 295 checked | 29% of 298 checked | 40% of 403 checked | 31% of 326 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.