SQ has the strongest read; AAPL has the most behind it.
Two lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: AAPL’s read rests on 369,483 contracts but our 4h record on it is 11%; SQ’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
SQCGNTAAPLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Neutral |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +34.5 | +28.1 | +7.5 |
| Evidence | 88 | 52 | 89 |
| Quality | 97 | 52 | 97 |
| Price | $0.00 | $8.74 | $333.40 |
| Contracts today | 43,471 | 407 | 369,483 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.23% · n=7,893 | not enough history | neutral · +0.38% · n=709 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 0% of 146 checked | 13% of 308 checked | 11% of 1,968 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.