WFC has the strongest read; BAC has the most behind it.
Two lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: BAC’s read rests on 273,460 contracts but our 4h record on it is 11%; WFC’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
WFCNUBACtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Neutral |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +44.9 | +32.9 | −6.3 |
| Evidence | 73 | 74 | 76 |
| Quality | 82 | 82 | 85 |
| Price | $82.03 | $15.38 | $53.64 |
| Contracts today | 22,477 | 24,107 | 273,460 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 | neutral · +1.15% · n=1,055 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 10% of 1,392 checked | 25% of 1,034 checked | 11% of 1,553 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.