Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Wed 14 Oct 2026/US open/289 names scored today/last score 16:03 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / AAPL vs PD · /stock/AAPL?vs=PD (was /compare/AAPL,PD)

PD has the strongest read; AAPL has the most behind it.

No lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: AAPL’s read rests on 369,483 contracts but our 4h record on it is 11%; PD’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
AAPL Apple · Technology×
PD PagerDuty · Technology×
The readNeutralStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+7.5−29.0
Evidence 89 38
Quality9743
Price$333.40$16.69
Contracts today369,48388
Calibrationneutral · +2.02% · n=721hasn’t paid +0.36% · n=16,987
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h11% of 1,968 checked6% of 232 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

AAPLPDtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add ORCLWhy is AAPL’s record 11%?