IFF has the strongest read; ALB has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: ALB’s read rests on 3,769 contracts but our 4h record on it is 18%; IFF’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
ALBIFFtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Mildly bullish | Mildly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +11.6 | −15.3 |
| Evidence | 61 | 46 |
| Quality | 78 | 79 |
| Price | $102.10 | $84.26 |
| Contracts today | 3,769 | 591 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.25% · n=9,682 | hasn’t paid +2.29% · n=7,579 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 18% of 422 checked | 25% of 382 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.