ALMS has the strongest read; JNJ has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: JNJ’s read rests on 10,222 contracts but our 4h record on it is 14%; ALMS’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
ALMSJNJtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +56.0 | +43.5 |
| Evidence | 70 | 73 |
| Quality | 86 | 85 |
| Price | $6.97 | $258.41 |
| Contracts today | 5,612 | 10,222 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.37% · n=22,387 | hasn’t paid −1.37% · n=22,387 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 21% of 817 checked | 14% of 1,447 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.