AMCI has the strongest read; FPS has the most behind it.
All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: FPS’s read rests on 7,526 contracts but our 4h record on it is 7%; AMCI’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +99.1 | +63.4 | +51.1 |
| Evidence | 48 | 77 | 73 |
| Quality | 33 | 91 | 82 |
| Price | $3.18 | $40.65 | $5.40 |
| Contracts today | 42 | 7,526 | 13,552 |
| Calibration | has paid +0.20% · n=52,410 | hasn’t paid −1.75% · n=5,423 | hasn’t paid −1.75% · n=5,423 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 0% of 75 checked | 7% of 203 checked | 30% of 476 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
AMCIFPSSMRtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.