Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/109 names scored today/last score 11:07 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / AMZN vs WMT, COST · /stock/AMZN?vs=WMT,COST (was /compare/AMZN,WMT,COST)

AMZN has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: AMZN’s read rests on 353,705 contracts but our 4h record on it is 15%; AMZN’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
AMZN Amazon.com · Retail×
WMT Walmart · Retail×
COST Costco Wholesale · Retail×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullishMildly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+32.9+30.2+19.6
Evidence 96 90 81
Quality979492
Price$254.06$110.43$947.92
Contracts today353,705166,85523,932
Calibrationhasn’t paid −0.74% · n=9,948
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h15% of 2,000 checked30% of 685 checked38% of 1,615 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

AMZNWMTCOSTtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add BABAWhy is AMZN’s record 15%?