Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/142 names scored today/last score 14:06 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / BABA vs WMT, ROST · /stock/BABA?vs=WMT,ROST (was /compare/BABA,WMT,ROST)

BABA has the strongest read; WMT has the most behind it.

Two lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: WMT’s read rests on 166,855 contracts but our 4h record on it is 30%; BABA’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

BABAWMTROSTtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
BABA Alibaba Group Holding · Retail×
WMT Walmart · Retail×
ROST Ross Stores · Retail×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullishStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+41.8+30.2−41.6
Evidence 88 90 63
Quality959483
Price$107.00$110.43$221.61
Contracts today61,270166,8551,021
Calibrationhasn’t paid +0.10% · n=21,921
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h28% of 908 checked30% of 685 checked17% of 257 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add AMZNWhy is WMT’s record 30%?