ITW has the strongest read, and the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: ITW’s read rests on 5,495 contracts but our 4h record on it is 27%; ITW’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
CMIITWtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +32.8 | +82.0 |
| Evidence | 58 | 67 |
| Quality | 83 | 78 |
| Price | $527.07 | $262.42 |
| Contracts today | 1,281 | 5,495 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 20% of 371 checked | 27% of 384 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.