Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/109 names scored today/last score 11:07 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / COST vs BABA · /stock/COST?vs=BABA (was /compare/COST,BABA)

BABA has the strongest read, and the most behind it.

Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: BABA’s read rests on 61,270 contracts but our 4h record on it is 28%; BABA’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

COSTBABAtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
COST Costco Wholesale · Retail×
BABA Alibaba Group Holding · Retail×
The readMildly bullishStrongly bullish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+19.6+41.8
Evidence 81 88
Quality9295
Price$947.92$107.00
Contracts today23,93261,270
Calibrationhasn’t paid −0.74% · n=9,948
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h38% of 1,615 checked28% of 908 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add AMZNWhy is BABA’s record 28%?