CRDF has the strongest read; ENGN has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: ENGN’s read rests on 3,311 contracts but our 4h record on it is 4%; CRDF’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
CRDFENGNtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +88.1 | −83.3 |
| Evidence | 62 | 68 |
| Quality | 63 | 60 |
| Price | $1.09 | $1.75 |
| Contracts today | 833 | 3,311 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | hasn’t paid +0.10% · n=21,921 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 38% of 473 checked | 4% of 1,389 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.