Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/127 names scored today/last score 13:22 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / CRDF vs MRNA · /stock/CRDF?vs=MRNA (was /compare/CRDF,MRNA)

CRDF has the strongest read; MRNA has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, no bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MRNA’s read rests on 52,509 contracts but our 4h record on it is 23%; CRDF’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

CRDFMRNAtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
CRDF Cardiff Oncology · Biotechnology×
MRNA Moderna · Biotechnology×
The readStrongly bullishNeutral
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+88.1−5.9
Evidence 62 75
Quality6392
Price$1.09$194.91
Contracts today83352,509
Calibrationhasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310neutral · +1.15% · n=1,055
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h38% of 473 checked23% of 761 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add PURRWhy is MRNA’s record 23%?