CRDF has the strongest read; MRNA has the most behind it.
One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: MRNA’s read rests on 52,509 contracts but our 4h record on it is 23%; CRDF’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
| The read | Strongly bullish | Neutral | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +88.1 | −5.9 | −83.3 |
| Evidence | 62 | 75 | 68 |
| Quality | 63 | 92 | 60 |
| Price | $1.09 | $194.91 | $1.75 |
| Contracts today | 833 | 52,509 | 3,311 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | neutral · +1.15% · n=1,055 | hasn’t paid +0.10% · n=21,921 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 38% of 473 checked | 23% of 761 checked | 4% of 1,389 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
CRDFMRNAENGNtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.