ETR has the strongest read; PCG has the most behind it.
All three lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: PCG’s read rests on 6,205 contracts but our 4h record on it is 10%; ETR’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
ETRPCGNEEtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +44.0 | +41.1 | +23.3 |
| Evidence | 63 | 78 | 74 |
| Quality | 71 | 91 | 87 |
| Price | $102.49 | $12.32 | $77.11 |
| Contracts today | 236 | 6,205 | 10,833 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 | hasn’t paid −0.74% · n=9,948 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 35% of 385 checked | 10% of 2,000 checked | 29% of 1,945 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.