EW has the strongest read; MDT has the most behind it.
All four lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: MDT’s read rests on 13,642 contracts but our 4h record on it is 59%; EW’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
EWMDTVEEVCVStape_history · hourly, daily close shown
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||||
| Composite | +46.5 | +31.1 | +22.5 | +18.0 |
| Evidence | 64 | 71 | 68 | 71 |
| Quality | 77 | 81 | 86 | 89 |
| Price | $84.12 | $87.40 | $284.02 | $87.80 |
| Contracts today | 1,273 | 13,642 | 774 | 9,029 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310 | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 | hasn’t paid −1.11% · n=9,499 | hasn’t paid −1.08% · n=2,328 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||||
| Our record here, 4h | 18% of 385 checked | 59% of 1,040 checked | 9% of 243 checked | 20% of 401 checked |
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.