FKWL has the strongest read; CSCO has the most behind it.
Both lean bullish. The difference is evidence and record: CSCO’s read rests on 25,812 contracts but our 4h record on it is 15%; FKWL’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 2 names as a list.
| The read | Strongly bullish | Mildly bullish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | ||
| Composite | +98.6 | +13.0 |
| Evidence | 48 | 67 |
| Quality | 40 | 82 |
| Price | $2.25 | $112.82 |
| Contracts today | 86 | 25,812 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=80,022 | hasn’t paid −0.14% · n=1,530 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | ||
| Our record here, 4h | 0% of 33 checked | 15% of 566 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
FKWLCSCOtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.