Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/117 names scored today/last score 11:59 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / GPRO vs EL, LEN · /stock/GPRO?vs=EL,LEN (was /compare/GPRO,EL,LEN)

GPRO has the strongest read; LEN has the most behind it.

Two lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: LEN’s read rests on 9,038 contracts but our 4h record on it is 5%; GPRO’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

GPROELLENtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
GPRO GoPro · Consumer products×
EL Estee Lauder Companies · Consumer products×
LEN Lennar · Consumer products×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullishStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+62.8+25.9−41.1
Evidence 67 59 74
Quality508389
Price$1.35$93.81$77.60
Contracts today1,1763299,038
Calibrationhasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310hasn’t paid −0.01% · n=92,310
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h20% of 1,190 checked39% of 595 checked5% of 341 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add PGWhy is LEN’s record 5%?