Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Thu 29 Oct 2026/US extended hours · opens 13:30 GMT/144 names scored today/last score 09:28 GMTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / HYFT vs PACB, ABCL, TMO · /stock/HYFT?vs=PACB,ABCL,TMO (was /compare/HYFT,PACB,ABCL,TMO)

HYFT has the strongest read; PACB has the most behind it.

Three lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: PACB’s read rests on 6,269 contracts but our 4h record on it is 30%; HYFT’s bucket has paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 4 names as a list.
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

HYFTPACBABCLTMOtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
HYFT MindWalk Holdings · Life Sciences Tools & Services×
PACB Pacific Biosciences o… · Life Sciences Tools & Services×
ABCL Abcellera Biologics · Life Sciences Tools & Services×
TMO Thermo Fisher Scienti… · Life Sciences Tools & Services×
The readStrongly bullishStrongly bullishStrongly bullishStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+99.7+82.7+38.1−30.0
Evidence 42 72 65 64
Quality24666080
Price$1.16$2.30$11.71$690.00
Contracts today16,269605947
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.75% · n=4,779
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h10% of 797 checked30% of 302 checked37% of 949 checked24% of 284 checked

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add DHRWhy is PACB’s record 30%?