HYFT has the strongest read; ABCL has the most behind it.
Two lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: ABCL’s read rests on 605 contracts but our 4h record on it is 37%; HYFT’s bucket has paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +99.7 | +38.1 | −30.0 |
| Evidence | 42 | 65 | 64 |
| Quality | 24 | 60 | 80 |
| Price | $1.16 | $11.71 | $690.00 |
| Contracts today | 1 | 605 | 947 |
| Calibration | has paid +0.78% · n=38,227 | has paid +0.78% · n=38,227 | has paid −0.95% · n=404 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 10% of 797 checked | 37% of 949 checked | 24% of 284 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
HYFTABCLTMOtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.