Skip to content
FlowDesk
Sign inCreate free accountStart free
● Sat 10 Oct 2026/US closed · opens Mon 14:30 BST/190 names scored today/last score 16:09 BSTResearch, not advice · every call is published at Proof
Stocks / ITW vs CAT, XYL · /stock/ITW?vs=CAT,XYL (was /compare/ITW,CAT,XYL)

ITW has the strongest read; CAT has the most behind it.

One lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: CAT’s read rests on 7,596 contracts but our 4h record on it is 6%; ITW’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.

+
Side by sideOverlay history Copy link
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
ITW Illinois Tool Works · Machinery×
CAT Caterpillar · Machinery×
XYL Xylem · Machinery×
The readStrongly bullishNeutralStrongly bearish
−100 · 0 · +100
Composite+82.0−2.0−55.9
Evidence 67 72 59
Quality788978
Price$262.42$797.82$101.99
Contracts today5,4957,5963,315
Calibrationhasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061neutral · −0.51% · n=4,671hasn’t paid +0.10% · n=21,921
30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed)
Our record here, 4h27% of 384 checked6% of 2,000 checked5% of 281 checked
02

Tape, 43 days, same axis

ITWCATXYLtape_history · hourly, daily close shown

All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.

Ask
Add DOVWhy is CAT’s record 6%?