TFC has the strongest read; JPM has the most behind it.
Two lean bullish, one bearish. The difference is evidence and record: JPM’s read rests on 25,073 contracts but our 4h record on it is 13%; TFC’s bucket hasn’t paid historically.
Sign in to save these 3 names as a list.
| The read | Strongly bullish | Strongly bullish | Strongly bearish |
| −100 · 0 · +100 | |||
| Composite | +33.1 | +32.9 | −37.6 |
| Evidence | 80 | 74 | 55 |
| Quality | 91 | 82 | 60 |
| Price | $332.99 | $15.38 | $46.18 |
| Contracts today | 25,073 | 24,107 | 833 |
| Calibration | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 | hasn’t paid −1.64% · n=25,061 | hasn’t paid +0.10% · n=21,921 |
| 30d tape (ink) vs price (dashed) | |||
| Our record here, 4h | 13% of 1,458 checked | 25% of 1,034 checked | 34% of 295 checked |
02
Tape, 43 days, same axis
JPMNUTFCtape_history · hourly, daily close shown
All values from the same rows as each stock page (stock_scores, tape_history, score_outcomes, tape calibration). Compare keeps the stock-page glyphs so nothing needs relearning.